  |
October 10,
1997
Nikken Ordered to Testify
in Libel Trial
By Jeff Farr
Associate Editor
Santa Monica, Calif., Sept. 30
After years of requests by Soka Gakkai lawyers, a Tokyo
judge ruled Sept. 29 that Nikken Abe, high priest of
Nichiren Shoshu, must testify in the “Seattle
Incident” trial. Lawyers for the Soka Gakkai,
the defendant in the case, have long sought to question
Nikken about his contradictory statements regarding
his actions in Seattle the night of March 19–20,
1963.
Soka Gakkai lawyers hailed today?s ruling by Judge Shizuka
Hamano of the Tokyo District Court as a major step toward
revealing the truth of the incident. “The recent
decision by the court is only natural because Mr. Nikken
Abe is the representative of Nichiren Shoshu, the plaintiff
in the case, as well as the person alleged to be involved
in the incident,” said Morio Miyahara, the Soka
Gakkai?s lead defense attorney. Nikken?s lawyers will
question him on Dec. 22, the next session, followed
by cross- examination on Feb. 2, 1998.
In 1992, when the late Hiroe Clow, an SGI-USA member,
first shared her account of the incident, saying that
Nikken was involved in a dispute with prostitutes the
night in question, Nikken publicly declared he never
left his hotel room after a Gohonzon-conferral ceremony
he had attended earlier that evening. But in September
1995, on the eve of Mrs. Clow?s testimony in the current
case, Nikken did an about-face, claiming he had left
his hotel for a drink and a walk.
Soka Gakkai lawyers first requested that Nikken testify
in February 1995. They believe Nichiren Shoshu has since
tried to avoid Nikken?s appearance in court because
of his contradictory statements and the fact that two
defense witnesses — Mrs. Clow and former police
officer Ronald Sprinkle — have given matching
testimonies about the incident. A second officer, Victor
Mayhle, has corroborated their accounts through a sworn
deposition.
The Nichiren Shoshu Administrative Office released a
response to Judge Hamano?s decision today, claiming
that only “for the sake of protecting the dignity
of the heritage of Nichiren Shoshu” had Nikken?s
lawyers tried to keep him out of court. But now, according
to the Administrative Office, Nikken has given his “gracious
consent” to appear in court and “clarify
the truth.”Because Japanese law requires any allegedly
defamatory statement be proven a lie before it can be
deemed libel, to win Nikken must present evidence that
these three witnesses were not telling the truth. And
if Nikken fails to appear on Dec. 22, the court will
have no choice but to rule that the Seattle Incident
did in fact occur and dismiss the suit, per the Japanese
Code of Civil Procedures.
The Seattle Incident suit was initiated by Nichiren
Shoshu in Japan in 1993 after the Soka Gakkai published
Mrs. Clow?s story in two of its newspapers, the Seikyo
Shimbun and the Soka Shimpo. Mrs. Clow testified that
a few hours after Nikken, then Nichiren Shoshu Study
Department chief, conducted the Gohonzon-conferral ceremony,
she was called by Seattle police to a downtown site
where he had been detained for arguing with several
women the police knew to be prostitutes.
The next day he was scheduled to travel to Chicago,
so she begged the police for his release, and the police
agreed, she said.
Mrs. Clow kept the incident to herself for almost 30
years to protect the priesthood?s reputation, she testified,
but Nichiren Shoshu?s excommunication of the Soka Gakkai
in 1991, led by Nikken, who had become high priest in
1979, inspired her to let the truth be known about Nikken?s
character.
The outcome of the trial is considered significant because
Nikken, who has often called Mrs. Clow a liar in speeches
and in print, has promised he would resign as high priest
if the Soka Gakkai?s defense proves the Seattle Incident
happened.
The current trial has lasted more than two years, 18
court sessions having been held. Nichiren Shoshu lawyers
in March requested an early verdict in the trial, which
was denied by then-presiding Judge Katsumi Shinohara,
who was replaced in May by Judge Hamano.
|
  |